For clients
Building owners, facility and security teams, design and installation companies.
If you own a building, you already own security systems. They have been paid for: the design, the hardware, the installation, the maintenance contract. Detectors on the ceilings, readers at the doors, the contractor sends signed reports. The matter seems closed.
Now three questions that most sites cannot answer. Will the evacuation announcement actually work across the whole building, not just the floor of the fire? What will an hour of downtime cost if access control fails on a weekday morning? Which ten of a hundred remarks should be fixed first if the budget covers only ten?
Until risks are expressed in money, decisions about them are made on gut feeling — and the gut almost always says “postpone.” tanstaafl.info translates the state of your systems into the language you use for every other management decision: probability × cost of consequences = the sum you are already paying for the risk, just without seeing it in your reports.
Recognise yourself?
Five roles around one building — each with a pain that the industry has learned to accept as normal.
Owner, developer, technical customer
You are sold a “reliable” and “modern” system, but nobody answers for the numbers: what is the probability of failure and what will it cost you specifically. Comparing contractors' bids on substance is impossible — only on hardware price.
The platform prices risks in money and lets you compare options before the tender: not “which system is more expensive” but “which one is cheaper once you count the risks it actually closes.”
Facility operations
A dozen systems from different vendors, each with its own console, its own log and its own password. The only source of truth is the contractor's reports — that is, an organisation grading its own homework.
One picture across all systems, a digital twin of the building and independent metrics: real MTBF, real false-alarm statistics, real SLA performance — your data, not the contractor's data about itself.
Security & IT security
Physical security and IT security live in different departments and different consoles. A badge swiped at the server-room door at 3 a.m. and a network login under the same account will never meet in one report.
Events from both worlds correlated in a single stream, audit turned from an annual ritual into a continuous process, plus a crypto inventory: which algorithms live where and when they are due for replacement.
Design firm, chief engineer
Hundreds of detectors and cameras placed by hand, expert review returning the project with the same recurring remarks, clashes with adjacent trades surfacing when deadlines are already burning.
Generative placement under code constraints, draft compliance checks before submission, specification and bill of materials in one click, IFC/Revit export.
Installation & service company
As-built documentation on paper, opaque volumes, and false alarms eating the margin: every trip for an empty trigger is hours and fuel that nobody pays for.
Bills of materials from the model, mobile inspection rounds with photo capture, false-alarm statistics per device — both a way to cut costs and an argument in front of the client.
How the audit works
The platform's first product is an independent check of what you already have installed. Independent in the literal sense: we do not sell hardware and do not take sites under maintenance, so we have no reason to “find” extra work.
1 · Data
Have a BIM model (IFC) — upload it. No documentation at all — no problem: a structured survey with photo capture, where the platform walks your engineer through a checklist, room by room.
2 · Check against the code
AI parses the composition of the systems and verifies it against a machine-readable base of regulatory requirements — from detector placement and camera coverage to power supply categories and network segmentation.
3 · Risk pricing
Every finding gets a probability and a cost of consequences. Not a dry “violation of clause such-and-such,” but “here is what this means for your site and here is what every year of postponing costs.”
4 · Report and plan
A findings map with priorities: what to fix immediately, what to fold into the next scheduled renovation, and what to consciously accept as a tolerable risk. A workable plan instead of a hundred lines of “redo everything.”
What a single finding looks like
Fact: a detector in the meeting room is mounted right next to a ventilation grille, closer than the minimum allowed distance. Code: a reference to the exact clause — open it and verify. Risk: delayed smoke detection; probability and cost of consequences priced in money. Action: relocate the detector, with an estimated effort. Every finding in the report follows this chain: fact → code → risk → price → action. That is why the report can be not just read, but held up to your contractor.
What happens to your data
Data is data, not commands
Your site's plans, models and documents never turn into instructions for the AI. Hiding a command in an uploaded file that would alter the audit result is impossible by construction — this is our baseline security principle.
People decide, not the algorithm
AI searches, cross-checks and drafts. Every significant conclusion in the report is confirmed by an expert engineer, and that confirmation is recorded. Responsibility for the verdict is not delegated to a neural network.
Critical things live on site
Once monitoring arrives: on-site equipment runs autonomously for up to 72 hours without the cloud. A dropped internet connection neither blinds your security systems nor loses events.
After the audit
The audit is step one; from there the platform grows with you. Continuous monitoring: independent metrics instead of contractor reports, equipment failure forecasts before failures happen, false-alarm statistics per device. For new buildings and renovations — generative design: device placement and specifications in minutes, not weeks. And for those planning decades ahead — post-quantum readiness: a cryptography inventory and a migration plan before it becomes a compliance order.
Pilot programme
We are recruiting anchor pilots for the MVP phase — a handful of sites where the audit module gets battle-tested. What a pilot gets: the audit on special terms, a direct channel to the team and priority influence on which features ship first. What we need from you: a site (office building, warehouse, retail, industrial), a contact on the operations side and the willingness to tell us honestly which parts of the report were useful and which were not.
Write in the chatContact
Project news lives in the Telegram channel; questions and discussion — in the chat. We answer personally: investors, pilot clients and team candidates alike.